Essays on Religion, Faith and Sprituality by Michele Madigan Somerville

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Thinking Outside the Box: The New iPhone App for Catholic Confession






Unlike many Catholics, I actually go to confession.

I was curious, therefore, to check out the iPhone App for Roman Catholic Confession, which, the Holy See and its designers remind us, is no substitute for spilling one's Catholic guts in a dark box like the ones we see on Law and Order

I began by logging in as myself and found sins a married woman might commit, organized by means of the Decalogue.  The use of contraception and supporting abortion are, for example, listed under "Thou Shall Not Kill." (Supporting Capital Punishment is not included.)

I quickly discovered that even a faithful spouse can easily rack up quite a list of sins under the heading of adultery. Dressing like Liz Taylor in Butterfield 8 and having a crush on James Franco are construed as quasi-adulterous. One of my favorite sins (and one I, intentionally, commit daily) is the failure to "control" my "imagination."  How much less attractive the Holy Father's own dwelling would be had Michelangelo been more obedient in this!

When I logged in as "Father Mike" I learned that priests' transgressions were organized differently those of lay people, not around the commandments but around disposition and duties relative to religious vocation.

Certainly envying the following sin on the checklist for priests and members of religious orders would qualify as "coveting my neighbor's goods":  "Have I overworked, not taking time for exercise, relaxation, prayer and reading?"

Huh? Why isn't that one on my married woman's list?

I was surprised to find the sin of overworking on "Sister Teresa's" (I couldn’t decide between that and Sister Bertrille.) transgression inventory because any nun I know would scoff at a notion so inane. Nuns work incessantly, tirelessly, for almost no pay, and can no more afford vacations than they can iPhones! 

Nuns and priests, like other adults, have a list of sexual sins to ponder and tick off: intercourse, sexual feelings, sexual touching, lustful kissing. The modesty requirement isn't spelled out in the same way for nun as for a "lay" (so to speak) woman, but it is reasonable to infer that nuns are expected not to dress like Liz Taylor in Butterfield 8

When I logged in as a single woman ("Hildegarde"), I noted that sins of carnality were almost identical to those applying to married women and men: impure thoughts, failure to dress modestly, homosexual activity, sexual thoughts, masturbation.

Masturbation remains a sin for everyone. Even single men like "James Franco" (I know he's not Catholic, but given his role in my own degradation, this alias for a single, male sinner made sense) is prohibited from masturbating. Men are called to dress modestly (like those in Butterfield 8) and are subject to all physiolically feasible sexual regulations that apply to women.

I was glad to see that respecting the poor and prohibitions against brutality had found their way in to the app, but dismayed to see that the making of war, capital punishment, child abuse, bigotry, waste, sins ecological, usury and greed are not explicitly noted.

A few years ago I attended a communal Advent Penance Service, at the end of which I wound up confessing to a visiting priest whose English was poor. He "absolved" me of my sins without understanding anything I'd said, and assigned me the kind of penance he thought best befit an aging ingénue dressed like Liz Taylor in Butterfield 8: "Go to mass regularly. Every Sunday," he said.

A few days later, I talked about this with another priest, a friend, who found my penance amusing. (I attend daily mass often and never miss a Sunday.) "You're at mass more often than he is!" I cracked wise about the blandness of my transgressions and the squandered opportunity: "I could have told him anything! Just think of all the grave sins I could have committed and been absolved for!" 

Catholics are divided on the nature of absolution. More conservative Catholics argue that a priest does the absolving.  Others insist that absolution comes from God and that the presence of a middle man is “pro forma.” Others, of course, deem these distinctions only unicorn-worshippers could care to quibble over.  There tends to be consensus that God has the last word on all things sacramental.

About seven years ago I went to confession for the first time in 33 years (Holy numerology being in effect.) I warned the priest ahead of time not to expect anything "mortal." Father could not possibly have been surprised to see me pull out the pocket-size notebook that contained a list of my sins; he knew me I was a writer.

I knew him too, well enough to recognize that beneath that man-of-the-cloth poker face of solemnity, my priest was pushing away the urge to roll his eyes sardonically while chuckling in amusement as,  itemized list in hand, I began to confess in the manner I'd learned at the age of 7:

"Bless me Father, for I have sinned. It has been 33 years since my last confession."

He smiled reverently, suppressing an all-out guffaw. 

"What?" I asked, "People don't do the 'Bless me Father' thing anymore?"

"Some do," he said, in guru voice. (Translation: "Sure, they do. If they're freakin' 96 YEARS OLD!")

We sat en face (No need to tick reading this off on your list; it's French, for "face -to-face.") but as I started, a partition descended between us, a screen woven of convention and faith, as palpable as it was invisible. It lent a strangely comforting formality and provided clear but perforated line of demarcation. 

Detachment and intimacy intertwine when two confessors engage. This dramatic, situational, fleeting conjoining can be transformative and beautiful. As a poet, I love how the word "confessor" expresses this potential.

Even as a child I thought attempts to render "confession" easier seemed silly. I remember overhearing Irish Catholic ladies at the kitchen table talking about confession.  One could off to the "next parish over" in order to confess anonymously. My own mother once queried me on why I would confess my sins to a priest I knew when I lived in "the borough of churches," in close proximity to many Catholic churches. 

Reading an introduction to Buddhism about 10 years ago catalyzed my interest in confession. Those new to Buddhist practice are often urged to seek a teacher.  I saw confession as both a sacrament and a form of attending a teacher. I craved grace, a dialogue about sin with a priest whose path I knew something about, and the holy wallop I suspected the combination of the two could deliver.

It bears the Nihil Obstat imprimatur -- there are no doctrinal surprises in the iPhone Confession app, which is neither godawful nor good, but I came away from test-driving the app thinking it one of many such props, designed to make a Church ruled by medieval minds and frigid hearts seem a little more “user-friendly “and a tad less backward. 


Unlike many Catholics, I  go to confession.


I was curious, therefore, to check out the iPhone app for Roman Catholic Confession, which, the Holy See and its designers remind us, must not be viewed as a substitute for spilling one's Catholic guts in a dark box like the one we see on Law and Order.


I spent a few minutes using the application yesterday. I began by logging in as myself and found sins a married woman (like me) might commit organized by means of the Decalogue. Sins like supporting the use of contraception are itemized under the "Thou Shall Not Kill" commandment. (It's interesting to note that supporting Capital Punishment is not included.)


I quickly discovered that even a faithful spouse can easily rack up quite a list of sins under the heading of adultery. Dressing like Liz Taylor in Butterfield 8 and having a crush on James Franco are construed as quasi-adulterous. One of my favorite sins (and the one I, intentionally, on a daily basis) is the failure to "control" one's "imagination."  How much less attractive the Holy Father's own dwelling would be had Michelangelo been more obedient in this!


When I logged in as "Father Mike," I learned that priests' transgressions were organized differently than were those of lay people, not around the Commandments but around disposition and duties relative to religious vocation.


Certainly envying the following sin on the checklist for priests and members of religious orders would qualify as "coveting my neighbor's goods":  "Have I overworked, not taking time for exercise, relaxation, prayer and reading?"


Huh? Why isn't that one on my married woman's list?


I was surprised to find the sin of overworking on "Sister Teresa's" (the name I used when checking in as a nun) transgression inventory because any nun I know would scoff at a notion so inane. Nuns work incessantly, tirelessly, for almost no pay, and can no more afford vacations than they can iPhones!


Nuns and priests have a list of sexual sins to ponder and tick off: intercourse, sexual feelings, sexual touching, lustful kissing. The modesty requirement isn't spelled out in the same way for nun as for a "lay" (so to speak) woman, but it is reasonable to assume that nuns are called to avoid dressing like Liz Taylor in Butterfield 8.


When I logged in as a single woman ("Hildegarde"), I noted that sins of carnality for were almost identical to those applying to married women and men: impure thoughts, failure to dress modestly, homosexual activity, sexual thoughts, masturbation --


Masturbation remains a sin for everyone. Even single men like "James Franco" (I know he's not Catholic, but given his role in my own degradation, choosing to use his name to represent the fictional, hypothetical single, male sinner somehow makes sense.) is prohibited from masturbating. He too is called to dress modestly (like the men in Butterfield 8) and is subject to all of the sexual regulations that apply to women. Though a man cannot have an abortion, he sins under the "Thou Shall Not Kill" commandment if he supports abortion in any way.


I was glad to see that respecting the poor and prohibitions against brutality had found their way in to the confession app, but dismayed to see the following transgressions under-represented: the making of war, capital punishment, child abuse, bigotry, waste, sins ecological, usury and greed.


A few years ago I attended a communal Advent Penance Service at the end of which people queue up and confess (to the next available priest) preparatory to Christmas.  I wound up with a visiting priest whose English was poor. He "absolved" me of my sins without understanding anything I'd said and assigned me the kind of penance he thought might best improve an aging ingénue dressed like Liz Taylor in Butterfield 8: "Go to mass regularly. Every Sunday," he said.


A few days later, I talked about this with another priest, a friend, who found my penance amusing. "You're at mass more often than he is!" I cracked wise about my the blandness of my transgressions and the squandered opportunity -- "I could have told him anything! Just think of all the grave sins I could have committed and been absolved for!"


Catholics are divided on the nature of absolution. More conservative Catholics argue that a priest does the absolving.  Others argue that absolution comes from God and that a priest facilitates the transmission. (Others, of course, deem these distinctions made by unicorn-worshippers.)  Most Catholics agree, however, that God gets the last word on all things sacramental.


About seven years ago I went to confession for the first time in 33 years (Holy numerology was in effect.) I warned the priest ahead of time that I wasn't desperate to unload anything "mortal" -- I just wanted to make an Easter confession. Father could not possibly have been surprised to see me pull out the pocket-size notebook that contained a list of my sins; he knew me and knew that I was a writer.


I knew him too, well enough to recognize that beneath that man of the cloth poker face of solemnity, my priest was pushing away an urge to roll his eyes in sardonic amusement as he looked at me with my notes, and listened as I started confessing in the manner I'd learned at the age of 7:


"Bless me Father, for I have sinned. It has been 33 years since my last confession."


He smiled reverently, but I suspect he was suppressing an all-out guffaw.


"What?" I asked, "People don't do the 'Bless me Father' thing anymore?"


"Some do," he said, in guru voice. (Translation: "Sure, they do. If they're freakin' 96 YEARS OLD!")


We sat en face (No need to tick reading this off on your list; it's French, for "face -to-face.") but as my confession began, a partition descended between us -- a screen woven of convention and faith which was as palpable as it was invisible. It lent a strangely comforting formality and clear but perforated line of demarcation.


Detachment and intimacy intertwine when two confessors engage. This dramatic, situational, fleeting conjoining can be transformative and beautiful. As a poet, I love how the word "confessor" captures and expresses this potential.


Even as a child I thought attempts to render "confession" more smooth seemed silly. I remember overhearing Irish Catholic ladies at the kitchen table talking about confession.  One could off to the "next parish over" in order to confess anonymously. My own mother once queried me on why I would confess my sins to a priest I knew when I lived in "the borough of churches," in close proximity to many Catholic churches. I knew why.


Reading an introduction to Buddhism about ten years ago  catalyzed my interest in confession. Those new to Buddhist practice are often urged to seek a teacher.  I saw confessional as both a sacrament and a form of attending a teacher. I craved grace, a dialogue about sin with a priest whose path I knew something about, and the holy wallop I suspected the combination of the two could deliver.


It bears the Nihil Obstat imprimatur; there are no doctrinal surprises in the iPhone Confession app -- which is neither godawful nor good.


I came away from test-driving the new Roman Catholic Confession iPhone app thinking it one of those modern features that appears to reflect expansiveness or growth. But really the new mobile application is one of many such props designed to make a Church ruled by medieval minds and frigid hearts seem a little more user friendly and a little less backward.

No comments:

Post a Comment